RT @stayingmycourse: @JoeNBC Please do your best to read the following and cease to promote a dangerous and ignorant narrative as to the or…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
#DrIanLipkin was also part of Fauci’s cover up cabal accusing everyone who doubted wet market hypothesis as “racist.” 💥💥💥💥 These are the kinds of sleazy, integrity free researchers who @NIH funds 2do autism research. @Columbia https://t.co/T2OIwqR3qH
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@Bubbakushdon @dense_evi This is a good article discussing the biochemical and genetic evidence https://t.co/uVQYVSLdOR
@SterlingLCannon @cremieuxrecueil More brainwashed clowns parroting fake news. https://t.co/zl1yeO6M8m
@galton_f @chelidon23 @hiremevalve @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @ImmunizedotCa @StanKutcher @DocMCohen @DrShazmaMithani @AntibioticDoc @RyanMarino Have a read. You won't, obviously, but I'd feel bad if I didn't at least give you the opportunity https://t.c
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@Bidwellcanuhear @TheJasonNichols @thebard1313 @michaelshermer Plain lie? It’s cute that retard try to double down without a single source: https://t.co/qE57BeufoP
@PeterVermont @R_H_Ebright @RichardDawkins Except that Russian-MAGA conspiracy theory was smashed in march 2020 when we'd decoded covid-19's genome. We can tell apart artificial genes from natural ones. The deathblow to the 'lab escape' conspiracy theory:
@AlkernS71 @newstart_2024 and then when it infected people, Fauci arranged a meeting and his top scientists wrote a research paper that says "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." Acknowledgements - Wellcome Trust - ca
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
@Call_Me_Emo1 @leroyb756 @Doubtin82838371 @michaer27 https://t.co/kzD67Dytkb TDLR; "We don't think humans would do something like this, therefore, it must have naturally evolved this way". That's literally what the scientific paper says. That was the
RT @Fjordman1: This article from 2020 is almost certainly incorrect. The coronavirus probably came from the laboratory in Wuhan, and may ha…
RT @Fjordman1: This article from 2020 is almost certainly incorrect. The coronavirus probably came from the laboratory in Wuhan, and may ha…
This article from 2020 is almost certainly incorrect. The coronavirus probably came from the laboratory in Wuhan, and may have been actively genetically manipulated by humans. Why hasn't Nature apologized for this and retracted the article? https://t.co/Be
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: In dieser eidesstattlichen Versicherung hat #Drosten angegeben, dass er nicht (a) die Möglichkeit einer Laborherkunft…
RT @StimmederVernu9: In dieser eidesstattlichen Versicherung hat #Drosten angegeben, dass er nicht (a) die Möglichkeit einer Laborherkunft…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @PhilippMattheis: Und am 17. März dann eine Veröffentlichung im Magazin Nature Medicine „The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2“, die ebenfal…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
科学雑誌Natureに掲載されたこの研究では、その著者は新しいコロナウイルスの起源に言及しています。 ⬇ https://t.co/1nCNQHub3I
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
atropellos a nuestros derechos y libertades. Los orígenes próximos del Sars-Cov-2 https://t.co/QG1EPy7FRr https://t.co/He8L8B1XMA https://t.co/Lg4xOITrtH
自然発生説を唱える論文にはこんなのもあるが、主旨は「フリン切断部位は自然でも起こり得るね」って感じで、論点が全然違うし、決定的な証拠でもない。 制限部位の分布パターンを自然発生と結論付ける研究は、今後現れるのだろうか? https://t.co/nTxUeeKhgR
@curiouswavefn The cult of science: https://t.co/I60WgGL9bo
RT @BillyBostickson: 1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper: https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx Kris…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @stayingmycourse: @JoeNBC Please do your best to read the following and cease to promote a dangerous and ignorant narrative as to the or…
@poliguyentist This was a famous one. There is a huge rabbit hole here including leaked emails and Slack messages that I'm not sure I recommend getting into. :D https://t.co/gyRyEsvGKr
@OenoneZer0 @xxfuzzpotxx @SarahTheHaider “It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus” https://t.co/PvuTNtkkOU
@billybinion Worse than that. Nature (the most prestigious science journal in the world) published their disinformation without question. Still no retraction, despite being demonstrably fraudulent. Science has been coopted by politics, without question. h
RT @stayingmycourse: @JoeNBC Please do your best to read the following and cease to promote a dangerous and ignorant narrative as to the or…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
https://t.co/7JWRquYUcE The Proximal Origins paper claiming a natural origin for Covid was published four years ago. A key claim, listed as claim #2 in the document, is that the Furin cleavage site, also called a polybasic cleavage site, was no big deal. Y
@Ayjchan A thread listing Robert Garry retractions, plus an expression of concern, plus a bizarre paper that he accepted as a journal editor
RT @danwalker9999: @emilyakopp Dr Garry has a track record of papers retracted due to data manipulation.
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Medicine https://t.co/gBXjB0r4Q0
RT @keisuke4713: Josh Hawley上院議員 公聴会専門家証言のRobert Garry博士がFsauci主導の研究室漏洩説を封じ込める活動に加担と非難 Garryは2020/3/17論文 コロナ近位起源の著者 https://t.co/K4PKAKZmHQ…
RT @keisuke4713: Josh Hawley上院議員 公聴会専門家証言のRobert Garry博士がFsauci主導の研究室漏洩説を封じ込める活動に加担と非難 Garryは2020/3/17論文 コロナ近位起源の著者 https://t.co/K4PKAKZmHQ…
RT @keisuke4713: Josh Hawley上院議員 公聴会専門家証言のRobert Garry博士がFsauci主導の研究室漏洩説を封じ込める活動に加担と非難 Garryは2020/3/17論文 コロナ近位起源の著者 https://t.co/K4PKAKZmHQ…
Josh Hawley上院議員 公聴会専門家証言のRobert Garry博士がFsauci主導の研究室漏洩説を封じ込める活動に加担と非難 Garryは2020/3/17論文 コロナ近位起源の著者 https://t.co/K4PKAKZmHQ コロナは「実験室で製造でも意図的操作🦠でもない」と結論 漏洩説がコロナpandemic起こした考え封じ込めに利用
@emilyakopp Dr Garry has a track record of papers retracted due to data manipulation.
RT @hypoautonomic: Yes, the claim that this paper, published in March 2020, is 'fraudulent' is due to a slack message earlier in 2020. th…
Yes, the claim that this paper, published in March 2020, is 'fraudulent' is due to a slack message earlier in 2020. this is outright suspicious only to people who have never been to a lab meeting https://t.co/42EhwirQMn https://t.co/TJ2aQTJEjU
@MicrobiomDigest thanks for work. Could you also please look into the proximal COVID origins paper: https://t.co/gSAvkCujcB This has WAY TOO MANY red flags, and the authors didn't even put major conflicts of interest until much later. This paper caused rea
@Johnincarlisle @YouTube Wrong @Johnincarlisle. There is no scientific evidence for an alleged SarsCov2 "virus" in the "Andersen2020: Proximal origin" Perhaps you might have to change your glasses, bc this one seems to be smudgy... https://t.co/Hv0x4Za4x
@Glinner Experts say peer review is infallible .. https://t.co/7IFjU6bGzO
@goddeketal The origin paper. When they concluded that the ACE2 binding was not 'optimal' (according to their software model), I knew it was a scam. 'This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation.' https://t.co/8cP3k
RT @JupiterQuirinus: @MrJerryGoode "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated v…
@marykirst @NadelParis @RobertKennedyJr Oh you mean this? https://t.co/swENXABPZY The one where the authors leaked texts show they didn’t believe what they were publishing and where knowingly lying?🤣 https://t.co/U7gn6ctPdh https://t.co/KtodSVK2Q3
RT @Nature: New paper in @NatureMedicine: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipu…
RT @JupiterQuirinus: @MrJerryGoode "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated v…
RT @JupiterQuirinus: @MrJerryGoode "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated v…
RT @JupiterQuirinus: @MrJerryGoode "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated v…
@MrJerryGoode "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." https://t.co/jjR1S6Cr0F #ActualScience
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
@Bryce_Nickels . . . does he mean Nature . . . like natural . . . or the scientific journal, NATURE? Both are DISINFORMATION! https://t.co/SYpz2ArDt5
@Jim_Jordan @JudiciaryGOP Media mentions 'The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2'. The Media including GOP never reported the FACT. It was an INTERNATIONAL cooperation between US, UK and Australia ! https://t.co/B85Ui3bZFI https://t.co/m1CQZpVkk3
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
RT @peter_berghmans: @JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
@JeremyFarrar Worried about online misinformation? #RetractProximalOrigin ! https://t.co/t616E2kPK8
@gaughen "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." https://t.co/jjR1S6Cr0F
RT @Amy31129057: I thought they said “It’s hard to make a virus. Otherwise, we all would have done it.”😏 https://t.co/XudTiX7uf1
@gerdantes Und bitten vergessen wir nicht die betrügerische Arbeit Anfang 2020 im Nature zum „Cover up of the lab leak theory“https://t.co/Y2S5iP5Zox
@Dissenting2020 @GeraldDoel83849 @StartsWithABang @bigthink @MichaelWorobey @jepekar @ScienceMagazine It's a fake news "correspondence" / commentary, yes..... It was rejected by @Nature https://t.co/PIQTU81Ili
Uno de los virus más próximos genéticamente al SARS-CoV-2 es el RaTG13, estudiado y presente en el WIV.
@carthhannibal0 @Victorshi2020 @SpeakerPelosi COVID lab leak has no basis in fact. https://t.co/WzeSUoyssK
@InWuchang @past_is_future https://t.co/ZbLfoarmXf the article cited previously
RT @RefugeOfSinner5: This is the paper from Nature that Dr Fauci referred to in his speech from the podium of the Whitehouse back in 2020.…
@covie_93 Fauci can’t have that - so he compels Andersen and a few other demons to write a paper that says “NO CHANCE IT CAME FROM A LAB” - if he does this, Kris will get a fat NIH grant. The one sitting on Fauci’s desk just waiting for his approval. So he
RT @jarikuikanmaki: Pandemian käynnistyessä alkuvuodesta 2020 Fauci orkestroi myös "Proximal origin" -artikkelin julkaisun. Proximal orig…
@killuminat1984 @LeeHatherell @yay_its_james She should publish it then, like these people and countless others https://t.co/uVQYVSLLEp
@DoctorNoLeaky @emilyakopp @atrupar A biosafety accident is a contrived way for Americans to distract from and validate the US’s disastrous handling of COVID under Trump. “This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulati
@BasedMikeLee Mike, next time you’re in the Patk City area, let me know. I’ll explain in the simplest terms how wrong you are about the “…to create a virus” part in particular. In advance, read about genomics and proteomics. And read Andersen’s Nature Medi