↓ Skip to main content

The longer the better: evidence that narwhal tusks are sexually selected

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
147 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The longer the better: evidence that narwhal tusks are sexually selected
Published in
Biology Letters, March 2020
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zackary A. Graham, Eva Garde, Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen, Alexandre V. Palaoro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 40%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 422. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#52,955
of 22,192,088 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#64
of 3,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,725
of 291,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,192,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.