You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early Identification of HIV: Empirical Support for Jail-Based Screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037603 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex de Voux, Anne C. Spaulding, Curt Beckwith, Ann Avery, Chyvette Williams, Lauren C. Messina, Sarah Ball, Frederick L. Altice |
Abstract |
Although routine HIV testing is recommended for jails, little empirical data exist describing newly diagnosed individuals in this setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,466,646
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#109,777
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,101
of 166,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,818
of 3,783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.