You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Making Nd3+ a Sensitive Luminescent Thermometer for Physiological Temperatures—An Account of Pitfalls in Boltzmann Thermometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nanomaterials, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.3390/nano10030543 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Markus Suta, Željka Antić, Vesna Ðorđević, Sanja Kuzman, Miroslav D. Dramićanin, Andries Meijerink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 14% |
Serbia | 1 | 14% |
Portugal | 1 | 14% |
Belgium | 1 | 14% |
Germany | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 17 | 23% |
Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 15% |
Materials Science | 6 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,555,527
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from Nanomaterials
#492
of 4,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,182
of 370,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanomaterials
#20
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.