↓ Skip to main content

Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00213-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mallory C. Stites, Laura E. Matzen, Zoe N. Gastelum

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#11,717,205
of 15,355,386 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#136
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,892
of 264,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,355,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them