↓ Skip to main content

Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: A global meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
26 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: A global meta-analysis
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103799
Authors

Evan R. Kuras, Paige S. Warren, John Aloysius Zinda, Myla F.J. Aronson, Sarel Cilliers, Mark A. Goddard, Charles H. Nilon, Richelle Winkler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 45 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#877,866
of 19,998,134 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#130
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,219
of 287,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,998,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.