↓ Skip to main content

Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: A global meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: A global meta-analysis
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103799
Authors

Evan R. Kuras, Paige S. Warren, John Aloysius Zinda, Myla F.J. Aronson, Sarel Cilliers, Mark A. Goddard, Charles H. Nilon, Richelle Winkler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 68 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 16%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 82 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,284,564
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#192
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,573
of 434,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.