You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: A global meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103799 |
Authors |
Evan R. Kuras, Paige S. Warren, John Aloysius Zinda, Myla F.J. Aronson, Sarel Cilliers, Mark A. Goddard, Charles H. Nilon, Richelle Winkler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
Researcher | 28 | 13% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 17% |
Unknown | 68 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 49 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 9% |
Unknown | 82 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,284,564
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#192
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,573
of 434,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.