The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Three-dimensional chromatin landscapes in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-020-0602-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Kloetgen, Palaniraja Thandapani, Panagiotis Ntziachristos, Yohana Ghebrechristos, Sofia Nomikou, Charalampos Lazaris, Xufeng Chen, Hai Hu, Sofia Bakogianni, Jingjing Wang, Yi Fu, Francesco Boccalatte, Hua Zhong, Elisabeth Paietta, Thomas Trimarchi, Yixing Zhu, Pieter Van Vlierberghe, Giorgio G. Inghirami, Timothee Lionnet, Iannis Aifantis, Aristotelis Tsirigos |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 49% |
| Scientists | 44 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 217 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 24% |
| Researcher | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 82 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 80 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#395,847
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#803
of 7,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,633
of 374,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.