↓ Skip to main content

Midwives’ views of traditional birth attendants within formal healthcare in Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Women & Birth, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Midwives’ views of traditional birth attendants within formal healthcare in Nigeria
Published in
Women & Birth, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Ohaja, Jo Murphy-Lawless, Margaret Dunlea

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#9,372,566
of 15,306,144 outputs
Outputs from Women & Birth
#563
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,598
of 263,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women & Birth
#57
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,306,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.