↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Socioeconomic Status Trajectories on Innate Immune Responsiveness in Children

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of Socioeconomic Status Trajectories on Innate Immune Responsiveness in Children
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan B. Azad, Yuri Lissitsyn, Gregory E. Miller, Allan B. Becker, Kent T. HayGlass, Anita L. Kozyrskyj

Abstract

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is consistently associated with poor health, yet little is known about the biological mechanisms underlying this inequality. In children, we examined the impact of early-life SES trajectories on the intensity of global innate immune activation, recognizing that excessive activation can be a precursor to inflammation and chronic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 11 9%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Social Sciences 20 17%
Psychology 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#176,551
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,327
of 181,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,875
of 3,808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.