You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Workplace and Community-Based Treatment Programme in South Africa: Determinants of Virological Outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Johnston, Katherine Fielding, Salome Charalambous, Mildred Mampho, Gavin Churchyard, Andrew Phillips, Alison D. Grant |
| Abstract |
As antiretroviral treatment (ART) programmes in resource-limited settings mature, more patients are experiencing virological failure. Without resistance testing, deciding who should switch to second-line ART can be difficult. The consequences for second-line outcomes are unclear. In a workplace- and community-based multi-site programme, with 6-monthly virological monitoring, we describe outcomes and predictors of viral suppression on second-line, protease inhibitor-based ART. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,779
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,937
of 165,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,946
of 3,748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.