You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in shunt, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and lung aeration with PEEP in patients with ARDS: a prospective single-arm interventional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2834-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan Stieper Karbing, Mauro Panigada, Nicola Bottino, Elena Spinelli, Alessandro Protti, Stephen Edward Rees, Luciano Gattinoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 21% |
| Colombia | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,155,975
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#922
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,010
of 393,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#33
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.