You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Oncology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan Phillips, William Yue Shi, Matthew Deek, Noura Radwan, Su Jin Lim, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Steven P. Rowe, Ashley E. Ross, Michael A. Gorin, Curtiland Deville, Stephen C. Greco, Hailun Wang, Samuel R. Denmeade, Channing J. Paller, Shirl Dipasquale, Theodore L. DeWeese, Daniel Y. Song, Hao Wang, Michael A. Carducci, Kenneth J. Pienta, Martin G. Pomper, Adam P. Dicker, Mario A. Eisenberger, Ash A. Alizadeh, Maximilian Diehn, Phuoc T. Tran |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 57 | 24% |
Spain | 14 | 6% |
Brazil | 12 | 5% |
France | 11 | 5% |
Germany | 8 | 3% |
Mexico | 7 | 3% |
Australia | 6 | 3% |
Belgium | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
Other | 36 | 15% |
Unknown | 75 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 137 | 58% |
Scientists | 57 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 384 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 52 | 14% |
Other | 43 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
Student > Master | 23 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 6% |
Other | 103 | 27% |
Unknown | 111 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 41% |
Unspecified | 19 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
Engineering | 8 | 2% |
Other | 41 | 11% |
Unknown | 134 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#114,607
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#211
of 3,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,873
of 382,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.