↓ Skip to main content

Last Interglacial Iberian Neandertals as fisher-hunter-gatherers

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
75 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
256 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Last Interglacial Iberian Neandertals as fisher-hunter-gatherers
Published in
Science, March 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aaz7943
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Zilhão, D. E. Angelucci, M. Araújo Igreja, L. J. Arnold, E. Badal, P. Callapez, J. L. Cardoso, F. d’Errico, J. Daura, M. Demuro, M. Deschamps, C. Dupont, S. Gabriel, D. L. Hoffmann, P. Legoinha, H. Matias, A. M. Monge Soares, M. Nabais, P. Portela, A. Queffelec, F. Rodrigues, P. Souto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 841. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,685
of 15,124,696 outputs
Outputs from Science
#517
of 65,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#630
of 256,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#37
of 878 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 878 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.