You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural violence in the era of a new pandemic: the case of the Gaza Strip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30730-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Mills, Bram Wispelwey, Rania Muhareb, Mads Gilbert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 235 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 12% |
| Ireland | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 123 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 212 | 90% |
| Scientists | 13 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 25% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#184,042
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,209
of 42,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,837
of 394,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#127
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.