You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A high-resolution map of the Nile tilapia genome: a resource for studying cichlids and other percomorphs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Guyon, Michaelle Rakotomanga, Naoual Azzouzi, Jean Pierre Coutanceau, Celine Bonillo, Helena D’Cotta, Elodie Pepey, Lucile Soler, Marguerite Rodier-Goud, Angelique D’Hont, Matthew A Conte, Nikkie EM van Bers, David J Penman, Christophe Hitte, Richard PMA Crooijmans, Thomas D Kocher, Catherine Ozouf-Costaz, Jean Francois Baroiller, Francis Galibert |
| Abstract |
The Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is the second most farmed fish species worldwide. It is also an important model for studies of fish physiology, particularly because of its broad tolerance to an array of environments. It is a good model to study evolutionary mechanisms in vertebrates, because of its close relationship to haplochromine cichlids, which have undergone rapid speciation in East Africa. The existing genomic resources for Nile tilapia include a genetic map, BAC end sequences and ESTs, but comparative genome analysis and maps of quantitative trait loci (QTL) are still limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,146,599
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,672
of 10,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,212
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#41
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.