↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Paired-End Sequencing Strategies for Detection of Genome Rearrangements in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Paired-End Sequencing Strategies for Detection of Genome Rearrangements in Cancer
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Bashir, Stanislav Volik, Colin Collins, Vineet Bafna, Benjamin J. Raphael

Abstract

Paired-end sequencing is emerging as a key technique for assessing genome rearrangements and structural variation on a genome-wide scale. This technique is particularly useful for detecting copy-neutral rearrangements, such as inversions and translocations, which are common in cancer and can produce novel fusion genes. We address the question of how much sequencing is required to detect rearrangement breakpoints and to localize them precisely using both theoretical models and simulation. We derive a formula for the probability that a fusion gene exists in a cancer genome given a collection of paired-end sequences from this genome. We use this formula to compute fusion gene probabilities in several breast cancer samples, and we find that we are able to accurately predict fusion genes in these samples with a relatively small number of fragments of large size. We further demonstrate how the ability to detect fusion genes depends on the distribution of gene lengths, and we evaluate how different parameters of a sequencing strategy impact breakpoint detection, breakpoint localization, and fusion gene detection, even in the presence of errors that suggest false rearrangements. These results will be useful in calibrating future cancer sequencing efforts, particularly large-scale studies of many cancer genomes that are enabled by next-generation sequencing technologies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
United Kingdom 6 3%
Norway 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 197 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 11%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 10 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 139 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 10%
Computer Science 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Mathematics 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 13 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,290
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,245
of 91,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.