↓ Skip to main content

A Possible Role for Metallic Ions in the Carbohydrate Cluster Recognition Displayed by a Lewis Y Specific Antibody

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Possible Role for Metallic Ions in the Carbohydrate Cluster Recognition Displayed by a Lewis Y Specific Antibody
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007777
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Farrugia, Andrew M. Scott, Paul A. Ramsland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Chemistry 3 18%
Engineering 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,254
of 195,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,628
of 93,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#279
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.