↓ Skip to main content

Global metabolic inhibitors of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases remodel the glycome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
14 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global metabolic inhibitors of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases remodel the glycome
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/nchembio.999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory D Rillahan, Aristotelis Antonopoulos, Craig T Lefort, Roberto Sonon, Parastoo Azadi, Klaus Ley, Anne Dell, Stuart M Haslam, James C Paulson

Abstract

Despite the fundamental roles of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases in mammalian physiology, there are few pharmacological tools to manipulate their function in a cellular setting. Although fluorinated analogs of the donor substrates are well-established transition state inhibitors of these enzymes, they are not membrane permeable. By exploiting promiscuous monosaccharide salvage pathways, we show that fluorinated analogs of sialic acid and fucose can be taken up and metabolized to the desired donor substrate-based inhibitors inside the cell. Because of the existence of metabolic feedback loops, they also act to prevent the de novo synthesis of the natural substrates, resulting in a global, family-wide shutdown of sialyl- and/or fucosyltransferases and remodeling of cell-surface glycans. As an example of the functional consequences, the inhibitors substantially reduce expression of the sialylated and fucosylated ligand sialyl Lewis X on myeloid cells, resulting in loss of selectin binding and impaired leukocyte rolling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 288 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 21%
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 75 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 56 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 75 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,595,372
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#951
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,663
of 168,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.