↓ Skip to main content

Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development

Overview of attention for article published in EBioMedicine, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 4,079)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
923 Mendeley
Title
Microneedle array delivered recombinant coronavirus vaccines: Immunogenicity and rapid translational development
Published in
EBioMedicine, April 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun Kim, Geza Erdos, Shaohua Huang, Thomas W. Kenniston, Stephen C. Balmert, Cara Donahue Carey, V. Stalin Raj, Michael W. Epperly, William B. Klimstra, Bart L. Haagmans, Emrullah Korkmaz, Louis D. Falo, Andrea Gambotto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,914 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 923 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 923 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 115 12%
Student > Bachelor 112 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 11%
Student > Master 91 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 5%
Other 173 19%
Unknown 285 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 63 7%
Engineering 48 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 5%
Other 213 23%
Unknown 327 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3828. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,367
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#4
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130
of 398,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.