↓ Skip to main content

A BAX/BAK and Cyclophilin D-Independent Intrinsic Apoptosis Pathway

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A BAX/BAK and Cyclophilin D-Independent Intrinsic Apoptosis Pathway
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037782
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastián Zamorano, Diego Rojas-Rivera, Fernanda Lisbona, Valentina Parra, Felipe A. Court, Rosario Villegas, Emily H. Cheng, Stanley J. Korsmeyer, Sergio Lavandero, Claudio Hetz

Abstract

Most intrinsic death signals converge into the activation of pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family members BAX and BAK at the mitochondria, resulting in the release of cytochrome c and apoptosome activation. Chronic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress leads to apoptosis through the upregulation of a subset of pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins, activating BAX and BAK at the mitochondria. Here we provide evidence indicating that the full resistance of BAX and BAK double deficient (DKO) cells to ER stress is reverted by stimulation in combination with mild serum withdrawal. Cell death under these conditions was characterized by the appearance of classical apoptosis markers, caspase-9 activation, release of cytochrome c, and was inhibited by knocking down caspase-9, but insensitive to BCL-X(L) overexpression. Similarly, the resistance of BIM and PUMA double deficient cells to ER stress was reverted by mild serum withdrawal. Surprisingly, BAX/BAK-independent cell death did not require Cyclophilin D (CypD) expression, an important regulator of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Our results suggest the existence of an alternative intrinsic apoptosis pathway emerging from a cross talk between the ER and the mitochondria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 17 19%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 19%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,563,282
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,133
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,771
of 167,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#733
of 3,847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.