You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education compared with pain neuroscience education alone in patients with chronic pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for the NEPNEP randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-4126-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesper Bie Larsen, Søren T. Skou, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Ole Simonsen, Pascal Madeleine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 99 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,657,420
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#954
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,309
of 387,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them