↓ Skip to main content

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 2,362)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
173 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, April 2020
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2019-101243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven P Cohen, Arun Bhaskar, Anuj Bhatia, Asokumar Buvanendran, Tim Deer, Shuchita Garg, W Michael Hooten, Robert W Hurley, David J Kennedy, Brian C McLean, Jee Youn Moon, Samer Narouze, Sanjog Pangarkar, David Anthony Provenzano, Richard Rauck, B Todd Sitzman, Matthew Smuck, Jan van Zundert, Kevin Vorenkamp, Mark S Wallace, Zirong Zhao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 45%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 69 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#313,063
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#24
of 2,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,510
of 372,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.