You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2019-101243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven P Cohen, Arun Bhaskar, Anuj Bhatia, Asokumar Buvanendran, Tim Deer, Shuchita Garg, W Michael Hooten, Robert W Hurley, David J Kennedy, Brian C McLean, Jee Youn Moon, Samer Narouze, Sanjog Pangarkar, David Anthony Provenzano, Richard Rauck, B Todd Sitzman, Matthew Smuck, Jan van Zundert, Kevin Vorenkamp, Mark S Wallace, Zirong Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 25% |
| Spain | 19 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 60 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 18% |
| Scientists | 22 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 92 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 104 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#365,981
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#26
of 2,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,069
of 399,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.