↓ Skip to main content

RDb2C2: an improved method to identify the residue-residue pairing in β strands

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RDb2C2: an improved method to identify the residue-residue pairing in β strands
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12859-020-3476-z
Authors

Di Shao, Wenzhi Mao, Yaoguang Xing, Haipeng Gong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,415,061
of 15,380,940 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,671
of 5,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,652
of 268,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,380,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.