↓ Skip to main content

The customer is always right? Subjective target symptoms and treatment preferences in patients with psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 794)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The customer is always right? Subjective target symptoms and treatment preferences in patients with psychosis
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00406-016-0694-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Moritz, Fabrice Berna, Susanne Jaeger, Stefan Westermann, Matthias Nagel

Abstract

Clinicians and patients differ concerning the goals of treatment. Eighty individuals with schizophrenia were assessed online about which symptoms they consider the most important for treatment, as well as their experience with different interventions. Treatment of affective and neuropsychological problems was judged as more important than treatment of positive symptoms (p < 0.005). While most individuals had experience with Occupational and Sports Therapy, only a minority had received Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Family Therapy, and Psychoeducation with family members before. Patients appraised Talk, Psychoanalytic, and Art Therapy as well as Metacognitive Training as the most helpful treatments. Clinicians should carefully take into consideration patients' preferences, as neglect of consumers' views may compromise outcome and adherence to treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 38 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#925,598
of 13,877,211 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience
#39
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,319
of 264,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,877,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them