↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of PIMA™® Point of Care Technology for CD4 T Cell Enumeration in Kenya
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilu Mwau, Ferdinard Adungo, Silvia Kadima, Ephantus Njagi, Carolyne Kirwaye, Najma Salim Abubakr, Lucy Atsieno Okubi, Mary Waihenya, Judi Lusike, Jackson Hungu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Engineering 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,892,077
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#98,159
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,124
of 199,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,021
of 4,718 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,718 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.