↓ Skip to main content

Dog Experts' Brains Distinguish Socially Relevant Body Postures Similarly in Dogs and Humans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
facebook
43 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dog Experts' Brains Distinguish Socially Relevant Body Postures Similarly in Dogs and Humans
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miiamaaria V. Kujala, Jan Kujala, Synnöve Carlson, Riitta Hari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 3 3%
Finland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 30%
Psychology 19 18%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#842,229
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,092
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,244
of 184,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#148
of 3,894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.