You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reporting of Methodologic Information on Trial Registries for Quality Assessment: A Study of Trial Records Retrieved from the WHO Search Portal
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012484 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ludovic Reveiz, An-Wen Chan, Karmela Krleža-Jerić, Carlos Eduardo Granados, Mariona Pinart, Itziar Etxeandia, Diego Rada, Monserrat Martinez, Xavier Bonfill, Andrés Felipe Cardona |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 44% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,893,368
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#98,159
of 204,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,077
of 96,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#486
of 869 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 869 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.