↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1036 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
918 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olaf Sporns, Christopher J. Honey, Rolf Kötter

Abstract

Brain regions in the mammalian cerebral cortex are linked by a complex network of fiber bundles. These inter-regional networks have previously been analyzed in terms of their node degree, structural motif, path length and clustering coefficient distributions. In this paper we focus on the identification and classification of hub regions, which are thought to play pivotal roles in the coordination of information flow. We identify hubs and characterize their network contributions by examining motif fingerprints and centrality indices for all regions within the cerebral cortices of both the cat and the macaque. Motif fingerprints capture the statistics of local connection patterns, while measures of centrality identify regions that lie on many of the shortest paths between parts of the network. Within both cat and macaque networks, we find that a combination of degree, motif participation, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality allows for reliable identification of hub regions, many of which have previously been functionally classified as polysensory or multimodal. We then classify hubs as either provincial (intra-cluster) hubs or connector (inter-cluster) hubs, and proceed to show that lesioning hubs of each type from the network produces opposite effects on the small-world index. Our study presents an approach to the identification and classification of putative hub regions in brain networks on the basis of multiple network attributes and charts potential links between the structural embedding of such regions and their functional roles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 918 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 36 4%
United Kingdom 13 1%
Germany 12 1%
Canada 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
China 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 816 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 238 26%
Researcher 209 23%
Student > Master 86 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 47 5%
Other 179 19%
Unknown 110 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 152 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 101 11%
Psychology 97 11%
Engineering 77 8%
Other 183 20%
Unknown 159 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,750,802
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,358
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,996
of 75,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#132
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.