↓ Skip to main content

Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
595 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Kaiser, Claus C Hilgetag

Abstract

It has been suggested that neural systems across several scales of organization show optimal component placement, in which any spatial rearrangement of the components would lead to an increase of total wiring. Using extensive connectivity datasets for diverse neural networks combined with spatial coordinates for network nodes, we applied an optimization algorithm to the network layouts, in order to search for wire-saving component rearrangements. We found that optimized component rearrangements could substantially reduce total wiring length in all tested neural networks. Specifically, total wiring among 95 primate (Macaque) cortical areas could be decreased by 32%, and wiring of neuronal networks in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans could be reduced by 48% on the global level, and by 49% for neurons within frontal ganglia. Wiring length reductions were possible due to the existence of long-distance projections in neural networks. We explored the role of these projections by comparing the original networks with minimally rewired networks of the same size, which possessed only the shortest possible connections. In the minimally rewired networks, the number of processing steps along the shortest paths between components was significantly increased compared to the original networks. Additional benchmark comparisons also indicated that neural networks are more similar to network layouts that minimize the length of processing paths, rather than wiring length. These findings suggest that neural systems are not exclusively optimized for minimal global wiring, but for a variety of factors including the minimization of processing steps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 3%
Germany 8 2%
United States 8 2%
Netherlands 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 305 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 25%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Master 39 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Other 80 23%
Unknown 36 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 18%
Neuroscience 59 17%
Computer Science 38 11%
Psychology 31 9%
Engineering 31 9%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 58 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,616,072
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,665
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,741
of 90,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.