You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Piloting the Global Subsidy: The Impact of Subsidized Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies Distributed through Private Drug Shops in Rural Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006857 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver J. Sabot, Alex Mwita, Justin M. Cohen, Yahya Ipuge, Megumi Gordon, David Bishop, Moses Odhiambo, Lorrayne Ward, Catherine Goodman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 26% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,548,055
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#80,374
of 198,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,732
of 92,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#233
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.