Incubation thought to be longer even by CDC up to 3 weeks! They have paper R0 revised to 5.7! Kids transmit to kids and adults, with high viral concentrations ALL will be saturated with virus in air covering hair/clothes/shoes/ CONTACT WITH EYES! https://t
"Active surveillance, contact tracing, quarantine, and early social distancing efforts are needed to stop transmission of the virus" - 'High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of #SARSCoV2' #ScienceOpen: https://t.co/JPE8s6jN1N
@AlexBerenson Not trying to curb its fast spread is not an option. As it will grow exponentially otherwise, 40% asymptomatic who shed virus from day1 so harder to detect. Can overwhelm health system in a blink of an eye. Hello Arizona today! https://t.co/t
@MikeGal041 @HeckofaLiberal @Chelseachemist1 @DDeviri @MLevitt_NP2013 Global infection confirmed is reaching 1 million every 4.5 days now. CDC latest estimate COVID median R0 is 5.7. US CDC says 'We estimated that the median of estimated R0 is 5.7 (95% CI
@bendon_james @TetotRemi US breaking daily records, global records breaking daily. We still at the start. Dr. Fauci said my job is not to sell 'optimism', it is to tell the facts. Their new estimates are very sobering, clearly has been underestimated. Exp
@uqt692 @MilesHilarius @mbeckett 7/8 IMO the "asymptomatic super spreader" is a senationalised term. The r0 (basic reproduction number) is what's important. It was initially thought to be around 2.2-2.7 One study suggested it is as high as 5.7. https://t.c
@Telstar22995931 @uksciencechief For anyone interested to read it in full. I do not think how highly contagious this virus is has been properly explained to the public. There is no mandatory mask wearing indoors even now except public transport. Go figure
5.7? Holy fuck.
@maddow So CDC is placing the R-naught of this coronavirus at...5.7??? Shouldn’t everyone know about this? https://t.co/CfzUjqN7z2
New Data from the CDC suggests an R0 of 5.7! https://t.co/obgrkYPS3Z via @CDCgov
@theAliceRoberts Alas, things will get much worse once with the reopening from July 4th. 90% of the country hasn't yet had the virus and in the wild, it grows exponentially with an R0 of around 5.7 (it's about as infectious as polio) https://t.co/4SwfBWs4
@mitchellichtman Median R0=5.7. https://t.co/n8qywS9Wzy
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7(95%CI 3.8〜8.9)と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/zA2PP95gIf https://t.co/xLEKfPBPo1
@HarryDogood @NAChristakis Most infectious novel virus to emerge since Small Pox & Measles. 'We estimated that the median of estimated R0 is 5.7 (95% CI of 3.8–8.9)'. That is why Asian countries take ZERO chances & want NO clusters to form!!! https
RT @CDC_EIDjournal: High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5…
RT @CDC_EIDjournal: High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5…
COVID-19 has R₀ = 5.7 (95%CI 3.8–8.9). This means that the herd immunity threshold is 73%–89% of the population. ∴ We need a safe and highly effective vaccine that almost everyone takes. Public vaccine education must begin now. https://t.co/anXsN8d8Nk via
@eidietrich In "The Peak that Wasn't" you wrote, "COVID-19 patients infect about 5.7 people, according to the CDC." Are you getting that R0 number from here https://t.co/7pDWdrz8vQ? (Also, thanks for fine journalism, as always.)
@blogofjake @elonmusk @geekwire Most infectious novel virus to emerge since Small Pox and Measles so has been underestimated how fast it can spread. If public health care is overrun then infection fatality rate is around 10%-15%. It will get overrun in a l
@Diezkad @GustArballo @Carrous_el COVID no es una gripe y su mortalidad es desconocida, pero se estima que va del 1 al 10%. La mortalidad de H1N1 en comparación es del 0.05%, y su R menor, de 1.5 en promedio sin cuarentena, vs 2 a 3 del COVID. https://t.
One study estimated, the virus spread with an R0 of 5.7 — a catastrophically high figure. https://t.co/ywDdQpNyno https://t.co/IgGHmecOou
@DrDenaGrayson SARS-CoV-2 R0 may be higher than the initial estimates: https://t.co/7YLD2YIv9y
High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5y6G9gbz (#COVID19, #SARSCoV2) https://t.co/lA4eunzHr7
@moma2mimi Infection rates (or basic reproduction number) are what are called R0 and calculate factors of infectious period x contact rate x mode of transmission - H1N1 was between 1.4 and 1.6. Prelim estimates had COVID at 2 or 3 but is now calculated to
@LouiseRawAuthor @bbclaurak With an in-the-wild COVID-19 R0 of ~5.7, 20 cases today becomes 21,112 cases in five fortnights' (10 weeks) time https://t.co/4SwfBWs4Cd
Median R0 of COVID-19 may be 5.7 according to new paper published in Emerging Infectious Disease Journal. https://t.co/7YLD2YIv9y
@AZPaulC @abc15 @ItIsHotInHere Initial estimates for COVID19 R0 was in the 2.2-2.7 range. But recent papers suggest it may be as high as 5.7. https://t.co/7YLD2YIv9y
@ehundman No, I think you miss my point. R0 is the “basic reproduction number” upon which NPI must act. The larger it is parameterized, the ‘harder’ it will be for NPI to drop R<1 Common range I’ve seen is mid 2’s. But this came out - have not seen cri
The R0 values have implications for predicting the effects of pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical interventions. Threshold for combined vaccine efficacy and herd immunity needed for disease extinction is calculated as 1 – 1/R0. Eg R0 = 2.2, HI=55% htt
Influenza vs Covid19 ile ilgili tweet dizisi: https://t.co/4Af70qzmnN Preliminer genom karşılaştırma: https://t.co/0rtnWBSFE1 R0 değerleri ile ilgili: https://t.co/5IPXcqOzWo https://t.co/GsImsvP7tq https://t.co/Wh0PVB8j0S +++
@helllooo1989 @HedgeyeDJ @Hedgeye R0 (sans any nonpharmaceutical interventions) was pegged at 5.7 by Los Alamos crew all the way back in February: https://t.co/PybJOiZ5yM https://t.co/qBcSSkC2H9
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/ErEAmRoFQQ via @CDCgov
@AfurKnox @Ellis_Greenwood @LukeGromen We first learned of this back in February. Preprint: https://t.co/D2XePaQVjv CDC approved early release to be published July has been up since early May IIRC: https://t.co/PybJOiZ5yM https://t.co/hgs4G80xGK
Here’s the link and more from that study. Distancing/masks bring the R0 numbers down. https://t.co/wIMTXZKK3N https://t.co/xVAseq3jnf
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/ABh5jcl7sO
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/Dl3bIbm87I
More WHO mixed messaging, especially when CDC has this release (open to updates)planned for July! It makes me think THEY (WHO/CDC) WANT THIS TO SPREAD! https://t.co/7U4YPLYoFs FlimsyNONprotectiveMASKS/SurfaceSPREADminimized! THEY LIE to SPREAD&TO PUSH
RT @cakasana: IKLAN: ini link artikel yang tadi masalah R0 https://t.co/h3E4emiUXo (matur nuwun mas @afrkml)
@hganzo @velardedaoiz2 @drizzt__dourden Valor de uno de los últimos estudios con datos de China, R0 = 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9), como el triple de las estimaciones iniciales serias (en febrero y después). https://t.co/0j3SqGwF4t
IKLAN: ini link artikel yang tadi masalah R0 https://t.co/h3E4emiUXo (matur nuwun mas @afrkml)
@cakasana jangan bilang "informasi dari saya" bang hehe. kalau misalnya ngasih info dalam bentuk thread begini, usahain sumbernya lgsg dari artikel/jurnal nih sumber yg kuambil ketika waktu itu kubilang Ro nya jadi 5,7. Artikel ini terbit dlm jurnal bulan
Around ~82% of the population has to be immune, through either vaccination or prior infection, to achieve herd immunity to COVID-19. You can calculate the impact of uncontrolled disease spread yourself. Stay safe Ref : https://t.co/F0VTAYm8hz #COVID19 @Zak
@rockmom @redsteeze Brooklyn is in King's county. Worst stats in the nation. JHU stats = 2178 infections per 100k. A protest of 50K could potentially have 1100 infected. At R0 = 5.7 (CDC: https://t.co/weiO2ZlwAr) you could get 6300 new infections. County f
@TrevorM03090057 @IainDale I tell a lie, R rate as high as 5.7 https://t.co/75UvffoKqk
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC @StuHirstInfoSec good research this one. https://t.co/0uChmEMlY6
@DanielleFong Here is why I think that: Huge asymptomatic rate and R(5.7). I can't find more recent data on R(0). Let me know if you have any: https://t.co/Mb7nbFpa4q
RT @_adriana6_: @Kurtdiesal @paquing184 Morning! The range is 14 days, the average is about 5. I’m in Epi, so I rather clarify incubation p…
RT @_adriana6_: @Kurtdiesal @paquing184 Morning! The range is 14 days, the average is about 5. I’m in Epi, so I rather clarify incubation p…
@Kurtdiesal @paquing184 Morning! The range is 14 days, the average is about 5. I’m in Epi, so I rather clarify incubation periods.If you have a source that says average is 14 days please share, I’m working on a SAR-CoV-2 report. https://t.co/KU3SF4WIsS h
RT @DrEricDing: 🚨New higher R0 from CDC reanalysis... it’s a 5.7!🚨(95% Confidence Interval: 3.8–8.9). Wowzers. This much higher #SARSCoV2 R…
Nobody really knows the spread rate in a large crowd...but there's reason to think its higher than the median spread rate. The median R0 is of 5.7, according to this study published online in Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://t.co/2AYsjcL3KL 4/14
Just a reminder via @CDC_NCEZID High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome #Coronavirus 2 [#SARSCoV2] https://t.co/x58Nb51qvc https://t.co/WlGmJkhnFH
@GMA Heads up on a CDC planned July 2020 release open to be updated before release! New analysis indicating R0=5.7 longer serial interval and latent infections! https://t.co/7U4YPLYoFs
@POTUS FYI: CDC planned July 2020 release open to be updated before release! New analysis indicating R0=5.7 longer serial interval and latent infections! https://t.co/7U4YPLYoFs Why aren’t they reporting on this NOW with all these protests! We need a State
@MonstranceMetal @BBCNews Feel free to do the maths on deaths at 0.82% IFR across 82% of UK population for herd immunity (based on median 5.7 R0 - https://t.co/ZhX97GgDEB) - hint, it’s 450,669! If it was 0.05%, as you stated, would be 27,480 deaths total,
@Ben56542436 @Transition_Fitn @Toro_Trades @StanTradingMan https://t.co/1JvTTjXr3Z Their data held up through the peer-reviewed process. I’ve seen as high as 6.6 and as low as 1 recently. Different countries are finding different values which makes it dif
@Transition_Fitn @Toro_Trades @StanTradingMan https://t.co/1JvTTjXr3Z Not sure what you’re reading but CDC data has held a median R0 at 5.7 for months now. It was originally thought to be lower. I read peer reviewed articles for fun and have a science b
@mikegalsworthy @mikegalsworthy - I think you're being disingenuous in linking that uptick, week ending 15th May, with VE day celebrations 8th May, given it takes, on average, 16 days for covid-19 to kill*. * https://t.co/BVBN62dyt7 "...onset to death was
@realDonaldTrump Get prepared for CDC July 2020 release: They’re claiming R0=5.7 and serial interval is longer! They’ll push for strict measures! They claim to get herd immunity 82% of population needs to contract it. Other reports claim only 1.4% in US ha
@LindaKa22200905 @HighWireTalk Another new report from Caixin Global reporting. And CDC has a report they’re slated to release in July 2020 staring the R0 = 5.7! Also suggesting that 82% of population would have to contract to reach herd immunity. https://
RT @TanguyFilloux: L’autre pilier du caractère #gouttelette est le R0 à 2-3 au début.En fait d’autres calculs le montre bien plus haut entr…
L’autre pilier du caractère #gouttelette est le R0 à 2-3 au début.En fait d’autres calculs le montre bien plus haut entre 5 et 25 ! En plus la dispersion, le facteur k montre que dans certaines conditions il est bien plus haut comme les chorales avec des t
@Patrick21012333 @GovSisolak Again skipping over the contagious rate. Cmon just admit to your narcissism https://t.co/b2KQ0U813n
@Freedom_220 @JoPetersen14 @RiemDebra CDC lists COVID19 as midrange 5.7, which is extremely high: https://t.co/P44WM8VEVN Here's what R0 means: https://t.co/40Vpjt2qhC
@Mike_BanksMD @wareagle30 The minimum estimate for R0 is 2.2 - based on that 1-1/2.2 = 0.545 (~55%) for herd immunity. The median is 5.7 (1-1/5.7 = 0.824) or ~82% https://t.co/ZhX97GgDEB, could be even higher. NYC has high seroprevalence, but cases dropped
#DiMartedi @bgallavotti lei ha affermato che il tempo di raddoppio dei casi di #coronavirus ogni 4gg, magari, uno studio #CDC preliminare https://t.co/r06T6zUbUL raddoppio 2,3-3,3 ha fatto dichiarare a #Fauci "100k-240k" morti R0 M=5,7 (95% 3,8-8.9) @Gerar
@theWeenknd23 @scottpasmoretv Which article? You clearly don't understand, or you wouldn't be comparing total current recorded infection percentages with how many can be infected at any given event. If you want to learn here is an estimated R0. 5 dead out
RT @antonioripa: Non ci sono altre strade miracolose, e non è possibile pensare di costruire il futuro sulle speranze sempre meno concrete…
Gp120 RBD sequence is IN SARSCoV2! https://t.co/KLMa5oosEU AND https://t.co/BNUhy1n8kV AND https://t.co/oIVmnXkU69 Might need to research DENDRTIC CELL Implications W/SARS & HIV! https://t.co/BcxIT5Jlbr https://t.co/dVyHnzrXkg
It’s a set up, until you’re fed up!
@realDonaldTrump @ABC CDC JULY 2020 planned release!!! Can be updated before then, but BE AWARE of DATA and SPIN should cases SPIKE! Serial interval could be much higher too (incubation could be up to 6 weeks in some cases)!!! https://t.co/oIVmnXkU69 https
RT @Blackcatprowl3: @dondee_don @BWolmers “High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2“ https…
BEST TREATMENT SO FAR, for IL-6 blocker; Innovation Pharmaceuticals -- , announced that its anti-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) drug, Brilacidin, an in vitro experiment using VERO cells, reduced the viral titer (load) of SARS-CoV-2 by 75 percent after only 1 hour
@LBonneux En eindpunt 2 lijkt me van de pot gerukt. SARS is verdwenen door intensieve tracking & tracing en had kortere incubatietijd, quasi geen asymptomatische transmissie en was veel minder besmettelijk. R0 zonder interventie was in Wuhan & Ital
@DrEricDing @williamhamon It's an average but why choose an R0 of 3 though? The CDC estimates an R0 of about ~5.7 for SARS-CoV-2 in the wild, which is similar to polio https://t.co/4SwfBWs4Cd
@eriknels @EdwardMcKernan @wesbury @bobcareyfta Los Alamos study: https://t.co/PybJOiZ5yM This was first put out on preprint back in late February. https://t.co/FrrkDOvRRi
RT @HashemGhaili: Seasonal Flu Vs COVID-19 Learn more: - https://t.co/vEmaGu9Rzl - https://t.co/NKT3g2vc0V - https://t.co/dqGlEZ0Uu2 - ht…
@nadabakos @jottowag For example: https://t.co/H59sRcuAIz