| Title |
Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJGP Open, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kome Gbinigie, Kerstin Frie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 29% |
| United States | 11 | 17% |
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 70% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 423 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 17% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 21% |
| Unknown | 121 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 42 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 143 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#281,121
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#6
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,867
of 401,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.