↓ Skip to main content

Measuring transcutaneous bilirubin: a comparative analysis of three devices on a multiracial population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring transcutaneous bilirubin: a comparative analysis of three devices on a multiracial population
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Raimondi, Silvia Lama, Francesca Landolfo, Maria Sellitto, Angela Carla Borrelli, Rosalba Maffucci, Paola Milite, Letizia Capasso

Abstract

Hyperbilirubinemia can lead to potentially irreversible bilirubin-induced neurotoxicity. Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) determination has become a valuable aid in non invasive screening of neonatal jaundice.The aim of this study is to compare the performance of three most widespread transcutaneous bilirubinometers on a multiracial population of term and late pre-term neonates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 40%
Engineering 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,906,451
of 12,373,815 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,160
of 1,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,736
of 119,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,815 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.