↓ Skip to main content

Measuring transcutaneous bilirubin: a comparative analysis of three devices on a multiracial population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring transcutaneous bilirubin: a comparative analysis of three devices on a multiracial population
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Raimondi, Silvia Lama, Francesca Landolfo, Maria Sellitto, Angela Carla Borrelli, Rosalba Maffucci, Paola Milite, Letizia Capasso

Abstract

Hyperbilirubinemia can lead to potentially irreversible bilirubin-induced neurotoxicity. Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) determination has become a valuable aid in non invasive screening of neonatal jaundice.The aim of this study is to compare the performance of three most widespread transcutaneous bilirubinometers on a multiracial population of term and late pre-term neonates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Engineering 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,035,599
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#708
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,988
of 167,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.