You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Observation of Static Pictures of Dynamic Actions Enhances the Activity of Movement-Related Brain Areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Mado Proverbio, Federica Riva, Alberto Zani |
| Abstract |
Physiological studies of perfectly still observers have shown interesting correlations between increasing effortfulness of observed actions and increases in heart and respiration rates. Not much is known about the cortical response induced by observing effortful actions. The aim of this study was to investigate the time course and neural correlates of perception of implied motion, by presenting 260 pictures of human actions differing in degrees of dynamism and muscular exertion. ERPs were recorded from 128 sites in young male and female adults engaged in a secondary perceptual task. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,798,714
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,254
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,688
of 92,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#119
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.