↓ Skip to main content

Hypnosis during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period for preventing postnatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypnosis during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period for preventing postnatal depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009062.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsuhiro Sado, Erika Ota, Andrew Stickley, Rintaro Mori

Abstract

The morbidity caused by postnatal depression is enormous. Several psychological or psychosocial interventions have appeared to be effective for treating the disorder although they have not shown a clear benefit in preventing the development of PND. As yet however, the effectiveness of hypnosis has not been evaluated in relation to this.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Unspecified 11 9%
Other 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 37%
Psychology 29 25%
Unspecified 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 16 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,117,060
of 12,422,413 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,114
of 8,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,006
of 119,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,422,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.