You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2011.40.4772 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy N. Baxter, Joan L. Warren, Michael J. Barrett, Therese A. Stukel, V. Paul Doria-Rose |
| Abstract |
We designed this study to evaluate the association of colonoscopy with colorectal cancer (CRC) death in the United States by site of CRC and endoscopist specialty. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,146,631
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,798
of 22,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,144
of 181,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.