↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
DOI 10.1200/jco.2011.40.4772
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy N. Baxter, Joan L. Warren, Michael J. Barrett, Therese A. Stukel, V. Paul Doria-Rose

Abstract

We designed this study to evaluate the association of colonoscopy with colorectal cancer (CRC) death in the United States by site of CRC and endoscopist specialty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Other 12 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 52%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#691,999
of 16,918,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,747
of 15,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,225
of 131,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,918,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.