↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in a US Cohort According to Site of Cancer and Colonoscopist Specialty
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
DOI 10.1200/jco.2011.40.4772
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy N. Baxter, Joan L. Warren, Michael J. Barrett, Therese A. Stukel, V. Paul Doria-Rose

Abstract

We designed this study to evaluate the association of colonoscopy with colorectal cancer (CRC) death in the United States by site of CRC and endoscopist specialty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 52%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 16 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#717,670
of 16,267,112 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,828
of 15,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,561
of 128,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,267,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.