| Title |
Compassionate Use of Remdesivir for Patients with Severe Covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2007016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Grein, Norio Ohmagari, Daniel Shin, George Diaz, Erika Asperges, Antonella Castagna, Torsten Feldt, Gary Green, Margaret L. Green, François-Xavier Lescure, Emanuele Nicastri, Rentaro Oda, Kikuo Yo, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan, Alex Studemeister, John Redinski, Seema Ahmed, Jorge Bernett, Daniel Chelliah, Danny Chen, Shingo Chihara, Stuart H. Cohen, Jennifer Cunningham, Antonella D’Arminio Monforte, Saad Ismail, Hideaki Kato, Giuseppe Lapadula, Erwan L’Her, Toshitaka Maeno, Sumit Majumder, Marco Massari, Marta Mora-Rillo, Yoshikazu Mutoh, Duc Nguyen, Ewa Verweij, Alexander Zoufaly, Anu O. Osinusi, Adam DeZure, Yang Zhao, Lijie Zhong, Anand Chokkalingam, Emon Elboudwarej, Laura Telep, Leighann Timbs, Ilana Henne, Scott Sellers, Huyen Cao, Susanna K. Tan, Lucinda Winterbourne, Polly Desai, Robertino Mera, Anuj Gaggar, Robert P. Myers, Diana M. Brainard, Richard Childs, Timothy Flanigan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,740 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1715 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 298 | 3% |
| Spain | 286 | 3% |
| France | 245 | 3% |
| Canada | 214 | 2% |
| Argentina | 200 | 2% |
| Japan | 170 | 2% |
| India | 141 | 2% |
| Mexico | 125 | 1% |
| Other | 1372 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3974 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6873 | 79% |
| Scientists | 981 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 685 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 198 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3330 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 448 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 397 | 12% |
| Other | 283 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 267 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 238 | 7% |
| Other | 670 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1027 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 915 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 253 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 237 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 102 | 3% |
| Other | 537 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1161 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8020. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#304
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#32
of 32,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31
of 404,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.