↓ Skip to main content

Pharyngitis: Approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Family Physician, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharyngitis: Approach to diagnosis and treatment.
Published in
Canadian Family Physician, April 2020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward A Sykes, Vincent Wu, Michael M Beyea, Matthew T W Simpson, Jason A Beyea

Abstract

To provide family physicians with an updated approach to diagnosis and treatment of pharyngitis, detailing key symptoms, methods of investigation, and a summary of common causes. The approach described is based on the authors' clinical practice and peer-reviewed literature from 1989 to 2018. Sore throat caused by pharyngitis is commonly seen in family medicine clinics and is caused by inflammation of the pharynx and surrounding tissues. Pharyngitis can be caused by viral, bacterial, or fungal infections. Viral causes are often self-limiting, while bacterial and fungal infections typically require antimicrobial therapy. Rapid antigen detection tests and throat cultures can be used with clinical findings to identify the inciting organism. Pharyngitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes is among the most concerning owing to its associated severe complications such as acute rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis. Hence, careful diagnosis of pharyngitis is necessary to provide targeted treatment. A thorough history is key to diagnosing pharyngitis. Rapid antigen detection tests should be reserved for concerns about antibiotic initiation. Physicians should exercise restraint in antibiotic initiation for pharyngitis, as restraint does not delay recovery or increase the risk of S pyogenes infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 19%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 8 3%
Student > Master 8 3%
Researcher 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 161 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 160 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,158,886
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Family Physician
#419
of 2,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,127
of 396,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Family Physician
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.