↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Denise O'Connor, Veronica Pitt, Nicola Massy-Westropp

Abstract

Non-surgical treatment, including exercises and mobilisation, has been offered to people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms arising from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, the effectiveness and duration of benefit from exercises and mobilisation for this condition remain unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 311 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 23%
Student > Bachelor 64 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 10%
Unspecified 28 9%
Other 26 8%
Other 100 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 16%
Unspecified 41 13%
Psychology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Other 38 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#552,911
of 13,055,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,807
of 10,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,436
of 119,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,055,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.