Why the “Hoax” Paper of Baldwin (2018) Should Be Reinstated

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, April 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 592)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 58 X posts from 53 X users, with an upper bound of 664,149 followers.

@MicahangeloV @MikeNayna @elonmusk @ConceptualJames @BillAckman If I'm reading this right, here's someone who wants to re-enstate one of them: https://t.co/fODPuKb40W

@sbkaufman Suggest you read Pluckrose and Lindsay's fat bodybuilding paper👇🏼 https://t.co/beVjTUP7CF

RT @ConceptualJames: And six days ago, a paper was published by a cognitive neuroscientist in a decent sociological methods journal arguing…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 54 additional X posts.