You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial Communities in Women with Bacterial Vaginosis: High Resolution Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Relationships of Microbiota to Clinical Criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sujatha Srinivasan, Noah G. Hoffman, Martin T. Morgan, Frederick A. Matsen, Tina L. Fiedler, Robert W. Hall, Frederick J. Ross, Connor O. McCoy, Roger Bumgarner, Jeanne M. Marrazzo, David N. Fredricks |
| Abstract |
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes and is characterized by poorly understood changes in the vaginal microbiota. We sought to describe the composition and diversity of the vaginal bacterial biota in women with BV using deep sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene coupled with species-level taxonomic identification. We investigated the associations between the presence of individual bacterial species and clinical diagnostic characteristics of BV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 438 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 93 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 119 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 50 | 11% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 93 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,113,311
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,664
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,549
of 181,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#398
of 3,917 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,917 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.