↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic diseases and pro- and prebiotics: Mechanistic insights

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic diseases and pro- and prebiotics: Mechanistic insights
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-9-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukiko K Nakamura, Stanley T Omaye

Abstract

Metabolic diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, are world-wide health problems. The prevalence of metabolic diseases is associated with dynamic changes in dietary macronutrient intake during the past decades. Based on national statistics and from a public health viewpoint, traditional approaches, such as diet and physical activity, have been unsuccessful in decreasing the prevalence of metabolic diseases. Since the approaches strongly rely on individual's behavior and motivation, novel science-based strategies should be considered for prevention and therapy for the diseases. Metabolism and immune system are linked. Both overnutrition and infection result in inflammation through nutrient and pathogen sensing systems which recognize compounds with structural similarities. Dietary macronutrients (fats and sugars) can induce inflammation through activation of an innate immune receptor, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Long-term intake of diets high in fats and meats appear to induce chronic systemic low-grade inflammation, endotoxicity, and metabolic diseases. Recent investigations support the idea of the involvement of intestinal bacteria in host metabolism and preventative and therapeutic potentials of probiotic and prebiotic interventions for metabolic diseases. Specific intestinal bacteria seem to serve as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) sources through LPS and/or bacterial translocation into the circulation due to a vulnerable microbial barrier and increased intestinal permeability and to play a role in systemic inflammation and progression of metabolic diseases. This review focuses on mechanistic links between metabolic diseases (mainly obesity and type 2 diabetes), chronic systemic low-grade inflammation, intestinal environment, and nutrition and prospective views of probiotic and prebiotic interventions for the diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 216 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 13 6%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 56 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,583,045
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#436
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,807
of 178,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.