You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ELISA versus PCR for diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-10-337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro EAA Brasil, Liane De Castro, Alejandro M Hasslocher-Moreno, Luiz HC Sangenis, José U Braga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,605,323
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,557
of 7,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,185
of 181,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.