You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A critical assessment of human-impact indices based on anthropogenic pollen indicators
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106291 |
Authors |
Mara Deza-Araujo, César Morales-Molino, Willy Tinner, Paul D. Henne, Caroline Heitz, Gianni B. Pezzatti, Albert Hafner, Marco Conedera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Latvia | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 62% |
Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 8 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,527,506
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#1,236
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,826
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#37
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.