↓ Skip to main content

A critical assessment of human-impact indices based on anthropogenic pollen indicators

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critical assessment of human-impact indices based on anthropogenic pollen indicators
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106291
Authors

Mara Deza-Araujo, César Morales-Molino, Willy Tinner, Paul D. Henne, Caroline Heitz, Gianni B. Pezzatti, Albert Hafner, Marco Conedera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Environmental Science 4 18%
Arts and Humanities 3 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,074,291
of 16,073,243 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#638
of 2,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,440
of 279,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#25
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,073,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.