↓ Skip to main content

Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012879.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard S Craig, Henry Goodier, Jasvinder A Singh, Sally Hopewell, Jonathan L Rees

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,951,472
of 15,917,147 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,702
of 11,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,080
of 280,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,917,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.