↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010529.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Dipper, Hayley E Jones, Rahul Bhatnagar, Nancy J Preston, Nick Maskell, Amelia O Clive

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#971,083
of 16,210,025 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,647
of 11,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,426
of 277,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,210,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.