| Title |
Early Self‐Proning in Awake, Non‐intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED’s Experience During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic Emergency Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/acem.13994 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas D. Caputo, Reuben J. Strayer, Richard Levitan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 372 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 88 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 8% |
| Brazil | 18 | 5% |
| Canada | 17 | 5% |
| Mexico | 10 | 3% |
| Japan | 9 | 2% |
| Sweden | 8 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 129 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 270 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 68 | 18% |
| Scientists | 27 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 627 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 627 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 68 | 11% |
| Researcher | 66 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 124 | 20% |
| Unknown | 201 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 224 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 2% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 11% |
| Unknown | 220 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 471. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#58,361
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#9
of 3,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,371
of 421,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.