You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Brief Cognitive Tests and CSF Biomarkers in Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Six-Year Follow-Up Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038639 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Palmqvist, Joakim Hertze, Lennart Minthon, Carina Wattmo, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Elisabet Londos, Oskar Hansson |
Abstract |
Early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is needed both for clinical trials and in clinical practice. In this study, we compared brief cognitive tests and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Japan | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 149 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 19% |
Unknown | 33 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 21 | 14% |
Psychology | 18 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,333,998
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#112,515
of 224,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,938
of 178,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,560
of 3,936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.