↓ Skip to main content

Diminished Medial Prefrontal Activity behind Autistic Social Judgments of Incongruent Information

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diminished Medial Prefrontal Activity behind Autistic Social Judgments of Incongruent Information
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takamitsu Watanabe, Noriaki Yahata, Osamu Abe, Hitoshi Kuwabara, Hideyuki Inoue, Yosuke Takano, Norichika Iwashiro, Tatsunobu Natsubori, Yuta Aoki, Hidemasa Takao, Hiroki Sasaki, Wataru Gonoi, Mizuho Murakami, Masaki Katsura, Akira Kunimatsu, Yuki Kawakubo, Hideo Matsuzaki, Kenji J. Tsuchiya, Nobumasa Kato, Yukiko Kano, Yasushi Miyashita, Kiyoto Kasai, Hidenori Yamasue

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) tend to make inadequate social judgments, particularly when the nonverbal and verbal emotional expressions of other people are incongruent. Although previous behavioral studies have suggested that ASD individuals have difficulty in using nonverbal cues when presented with incongruent verbal-nonverbal information, the neural mechanisms underlying this symptom of ASD remain unclear. In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we compared brain activity in 15 non-medicated adult males with high-functioning ASD to that of 17 age-, parental-background-, socioeconomic-, and intelligence-quotient-matched typically-developed (TD) male participants. Brain activity was measured while each participant made friend or foe judgments of realistic movies in which professional actors spoke with conflicting nonverbal facial expressions and voice prosody. We found that the ASD group made significantly less judgments primarily based on the nonverbal information than the TD group, and they exhibited significantly less brain activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex/ventral medial prefrontal cortex (ACC/vmPFC), and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) than the TD group. Among these five regions, the ACC/vmPFC and dmPFC were most involved in nonverbal-information-biased judgments in the TD group. Furthermore, the degree of decrease of the brain activity in these two brain regions predicted the severity of autistic communication deficits. The findings indicate that diminished activity in the ACC/vmPFC and dmPFC underlies the impaired abilities of individuals with ASD to use nonverbal content when making judgments regarding other people based on incongruent social information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Student > Master 22 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 36%
Neuroscience 23 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#1,352,750
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,920
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,335
of 178,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#253
of 3,962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.